Search for: "Render v. Jones" Results 21 - 40 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
Dec. 7, 2023), the Third Circuit dismissed a postconviction claim of legal innocence for lack of jurisdiction under Jones v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm by Bill Otis
 Beyond that, if the Court really wanted to render a broad ruling entirely forbidding consideration of conduct not included within the offense of conviction, of course it could do so in the Jones case. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  On this last issue the Court of Human Rights has consistently found that criminal statutes rendering “Holocaust denial” a crime are consistent with the Convention. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:03 am
March 28, 2012): The United States now concedes that Jones renders the placement and subsequent use of the GPS device unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In Ex parte Alba, the Board cited to Jones v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:40 pm by Steven Boutwell
Maersk moved for a judgment as a matter of law, alleging that Skye’s injuries were not cognizable under the Jones Act based on Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:25 pm by Gerard Magliocca
On the question of whether the Qualifications Clause makes Congress the exclusive judge of Section Three ineligibility for congressional candidates, one member of the panel cited Jones v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
Correia,First Assistant Wayne County Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on two consolidated cases (People v Brannon and People v Fernandez (2011 NY Slip Op 03676, _ NY3d _ [5/11/11) which set forth the level of knowledge a police officer must possess before, consistent with DeBour, he or she has reasonable suspicion to believe an individual possesses a gravity knife as opposed to a legal pocketknife.In People v Brannon , the officer testified… [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Philip Thomas
On Thursday the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed and rendered a $3.72 million jury verdict in Trustmark National Bank v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:13 pm
This seems to me to be largely a "forgot to put it on the record" problem.The judge dismissed the jury after it rendered its guilty verdict, but forgot that the jury hadn't yet decided whether the defendant had been previously convicted of a serious felony, which was one of the charged enhancements. [read post]