Search for: "Ricci v. DeStefano"
Results 21 - 40
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 1:09 pm
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Reva Siegel, the abstract of which states: Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia explained in his concurring opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:47 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am
As Justice Scalia said in Ricci v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Must a court read Ricci v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:59 am
” The court also pointed to Ricci v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:30 am
Marcus uses the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am
DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009), does not apply to disparate impact claims. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:51 pm
In Ricci v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:40 am
" A short time later the United States Supreme Court decided Ricci v DeStefano (557 US 557), holding that, "before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious discriminatory action. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
This concern emerged prominently in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
DeStefano.) [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:53 am
Plaintiff argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Ricci v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 5:45 am
In his column, Milbank pokes fun at the Supreme Court justices hearing the oral arguments of Ricci v. [read blog]
5 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
By Cynthia McNabb As suspected when the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2009, in the case of Ricci v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am
DeStefano. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:55 pm
Justice Scalia, concurring in Ricci v. [read post]
