Search for: "Richardson v. State of Florida*" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 1:06 pm by SLT
The court remanded a new trial due to the State of Florida’s failure to conduct a Richardson hearing. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Richardson, 597F.3d at 1295 (“We looked to ornamental elements . . . [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Merrell Co., Division of Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 174 So.2d 736, 739 (Fla. 1965). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
Nonetheless, reference to a fictitious party may be permitted if it is mere “surplusage” (see Richardson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
Nonetheless, reference to a fictitious party may be permitted if it is mere “surplusage” (see Richardson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Richardson ruled in July 1992. ''The facts show the defendant is a mentally disordered sex offender. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally have… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:52 am by Daniel Richardson
Lead counsel for DOJ’s investigation of Microsoft, he was primary career counsel in the trial of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal… [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:39 am by Jon Gelman
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case  which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]