Search for: "Rinke v. Rinke"
Results 21 - 40
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 12:12 pm
Ice Skating Rink at Public Square /Winterfest. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
The case, Christian Fellowship Centers of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 3:15 pm
” Rink v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
The apparatus of pipes and manifolds has to be assembled each time the mobile ice rink is installed.Prior art mobile ice rink cooling systemThe cooling member for a mobile ice rink claimed by the patent comprises the standard manifold and pipe arrangement, organised into discrete elements. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 8:28 am
Brian CorderyBy Nicholas Round On 10 October 2018 the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the matter of Icescape Limited v Ice-World International BV & Ors*. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 2:51 am
The case of Burki v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
In Crisp v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
In Roberts v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:01 pm
Kaul won in State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:06 am
The post Army v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:23 am
A recent case out of Connecticut, Madore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:31 am
Rink at Public Square /Winterfest. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:30 am
American Beverage Association v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Marie Largen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
” Examples might be a pool that only operates in the summer or an ice skating rink that only operates in the winter. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Apple v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
I always like to teach with Lollipops and Jellybeans for skate rinks: similarity confusing, but one reason is b/c the mark is conceptually strong for skate rinks but lacked marketplace strength. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 10:32 pm
Tex.'s patent dominance—and perhaps the end of the incongruous Samsung ice-skating rink outside the Marshall, TX courthouse.Impression v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
In the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:54 am
., Jr. v. [read post]
