Search for: "Robert Bishop v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Gray (D) “Working for better tax policy is not easy,” said Tax Foundation Executive Vice President Joseph Bishop-Henchman. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm by Andrew Hamm
Gomez is vice president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has taken positions on Supreme Court cases pertaining to both issues Gomez addressed. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am by Broc Romanek
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am by Frank Cranmer
In R (GH) v The Mayor of London [2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin), the claimants, Charedi Orthodox children, sought permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of the Mayor of London to extend his Universal Free School Meals scheme for the academic year 2024-2025 but to continue to confine the scheme to state-funded primary schools. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
Texas, which declared the state's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Kim Ward, has carried a torch for the bishops and blocked legislation that would pass if permitted to go to the floor. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
The spotlight stays on the high-profile union-fees case that will be argued this month, Janus v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 305; see Bishop v Maurer, 9 NY3d 910, 911). [read post]