Search for: "Robert D. Peterson v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
And thanks to the Chautauqua Institution for making this day possible and to Greg Peterson of the Jackson Center for your terrific hospitality. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Gallman, Robert M. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:58 am
" The roster includes state Sens. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Roberts v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
" Dennis Peterson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
(d) Use of ebt system. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
At Slate, Judge Richard Posner discusses the Court, the role of the Chief Justice, and the opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in McCutcheon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
Robert H. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The refusal of Michael D. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
Robert H. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Laws, ch. 140, § 131(d) (2020). 2124. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Roberts v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
It turns out that there is an ancient rule, dating to an 1872 case called United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994) (stating broadly that “[i]t is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence,” including when “any constitutional violation has been committed by a law enforcement official”); Peterson v. [read post]
