Search for: "Roberts, Board v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
S. 1301, 1303 (2012) (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Originally, the SEC defined and justified the prohibition in its 1961 Cady Roberts decision.[4] The Supreme Court substantially modified the SEC’s definition in 1983 in Dirks v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Holder and Rucho v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The ruling in Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
From Judge Robert Payne's opinion Friday in Sroufe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Board of Education on the basis of "neutral principles. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Board of Education, the court famously overruled the doctrine of “separate but equal” that it had articulated in Plessy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:40 am
V. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Reyes, Robert G. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
From Parker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Board of Education and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
It appears to us that Roberts assigned himself the Court's per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Roberts. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
“Sundholm v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Purcell Professor Robert C. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to speech in the political realm). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Robert C. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
