Search for: "Rogers v. State Compensation Commissioner" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court held that the Commissioner's interpretation was, at a minimum, reasonable and entitled to deference, and that the relevant state law did not entitle the applicant in this case to benefits. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court held that the Commissioner's interpretation was, at a minimum, reasonable and entitled to deference, and that the relevant state law did not entitle the applicant in this case to benefits. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
WerholtzCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-3040 November 10, 2011 Judge: Hartz Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law Plaintiffs, a group of inmates in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC), sued Defendant Roger Werholtz, Secretary of KDOC (the Secretary), under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and state law. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
A judgment on quantum was also handed down in the Central London County Court in the case of Brown v Commissioner of Police [pdf]. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has released updated opinions on what online services need to do to comply with the Online Safety Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Harris, Book Note, Reviewing Roger I. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
(b)    Payments will be allowed only to compensate for special services performed, and to reimburse for special expenses incurred, for the joint and common benefit of all plaintiffs. *** (c)    No amounts will be disbursed without review and approval by a committee of federal and state judicial officers to be designated by the court. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation David Erdos, writing for Inforrm in two parts, takes a first look at the Information Commissioner’s Office Draft Data Protection and Journalism Code. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The RSVP deadline is Jan. 16, not Jan.14 as stated in the flier. [read post]