Search for: "Rosner v Rosner"
Results 21 - 40
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:37 am
In Rosner v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:52 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Rosner’s fabulistic account of silicosis litigation and his role in it falls apart under even mild scrutiny. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Defendants, who represented themselves in the Legal Malpractice case, win summary judgment, but not simply on the reflexive use of the Rosner v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:19 am
The allegations underlying the legal malpractice claim merely “reflect plaintiff[s’] dissatisfaction with defendants’ strategic choices and tactics; there is no showing that those choices and tactics were unreasonable” (Kassel v Donohue, 127 AD3d 674, 674 [1st Dept 2015], lv dismissed 26 NY3d 940 [2015]; see also Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
It is not a big surprise that Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
The steps plaintiff took in litigating these cases were among many reasonable options (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]). [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
Additionally, with regard to strategic decisions “the selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice” (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
Bank v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
Aspen Grove Owners Ass’n v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:04 am
Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:00 am
Rosner. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:10 am
Defendant’s conclusory allegations that plaintiff law firm failed to prepare for trial and gather evidence in her matrimonial action do not state a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Barbara King Family Trust v Voluto Ventures LLC, 46 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2007]; see generally Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985] [attorney’s “selection of one of among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice”]). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
In addition, summary judgment dismissing all of the causes of action and cross claims for contribution must be awarded to the Hager defendants because HDW settled the legal malpractice claim, and the remaining grounds for seeking contribution, as set forth in the pleadings, are no longer viable (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 736; Crimi v Black, 219 AD2d 610, 611). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:45 am
Zalinskie v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Take the Second Department’s October 19th decision in Rosner v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 386-387 [1992]). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:52 am
The "selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice" (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]), and plaintiff acknowledges that further inquiry by Nihamin would have been futile. [read post]
