Search for: "Rules of Civil Procedure v. Rules" Results 21 - 40 of 14,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm by Béligh Elbalti
The Ruling   The BSC rejected the appeal by ruling as follows: “It stems from the text of the provisions of Articles 1, 2 and 7 of the [1995 GCC Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] as ratified by Bahrain in [1996], and the established practice of this Court, that judgments of a GCC Member State rendered in civil, commercial, administrative matters as well as personal status matters that become final [in the State of origin] shall be… [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
The Biden administration, together with the Tennessee and Kentucky families, seek reversal of the 6th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch looked to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, which “expressly allows the court to impose monetary sanctions on attorneys and law firms, which can include ‘all of the reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses’ incurred as a result of sanctionable conduct. [read post]
The US District Court for the District of Maryland previously dismissed the case for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, HLS students reported that: A Harvard Law Review editor and a Civil Procedure teaching fellow was part of a group of students that encircled a Jewish Harvard Business School student, holding their keffiyehs open to surround and physically restrain him while screaming, "shame! [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
by Achim Czubaiko, Research Fellow („Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter“) and PhD Candidate, supported by the German Scholarship Foundation, Institute for German and International Civil Procedural Law, University of Bonn. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:30 am by Adam N. Steinman
And they acknowledge—as others have—legitimate questions about whether current standards “have been cashed out in exactly the right places,” including whether they “should not be in a doctrine called or conceptualized as Article III standing, but instead should be handled by rules about causes of action, equitable jurisdiction, various civil procedure doctrines, and so on. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:00 am by bklemm@foley.com
After the district court certified three damages classes under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiffs had failed to carry their burden to present admissible evidence establishing how the challenged “All Natural” statement would mislead reasonable consumers acting reasonably. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:40 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 4.04 lays out the proper process for service of a lawsuit in Tennessee. [read post]