Search for: "SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL V US"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
County of Sacramento (2009) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
” California – California Business Groups File Lawsuit Seeking to Block New Campaign Finance Law MSN – Theresa Clift (Sacramento Bee) | Published: 2/24/2023 A new lawsuit seeks to block a state law that requires city and county elected officials to recuse themselves from certain decisions that would financially benefit any entity or person that donated over $250 to that official’s campaign in the past year. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that one of the grants, in Janus v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Underlying Land Use Approvals and Subsequent Actions. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
Ramona Municipal Water Dist. (2019) 7 Cal.5th 372, 383), and “a jurisdictional prerequisite to maintenance of a CEQA action. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:55 am
Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit’s decision in City of Boise v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
One decision, Lotus v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
AbbottThe Delta, the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, is ground zero in the debate over California water. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
PierceDocket: 09-1353Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals misinterpreted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:34 am
In Clemens v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305 [Municipal Services Agreement between city and tribe contained CEQA compliance clause and was not project approval triggering CEQA review].) [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Gallagher et al.Petitioners' reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association Title: Williams v. [read post]
