Search for: "SANDERS v. THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
United States). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:19 pm
Sanders v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Didham, et al., “Suicide and Self-Harm Following Prescription of SSRIs and Other Antidepressants: Confounding By Indication,” 60 Br. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, the 80-20 National Asian American Educational Foundation, et al, in Support of Petitioner Brief for Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation, Center for Equal Opportunity, the American Civil Rights Institute, the National Association of Scholars, and Project 21 in Support of Petitioner Brief for Scholars of Econmics and Statistics in Support of Petitioner Brief for… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
Atwood et al. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:10 am
Venrock Assocs., et al., 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
CHRISTOPHER SUGRUE, et al.,07 MDL 1902 (JSR)Applies To:08 Civ. 3065, 08 Civ. 3086; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:17 am
This is illustrated in Victoria’s Secret et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court attempted, in Daubert, to draw a distinction between the reliability of an expert witness’s methodology and conclusion, that Court soon realized that the distinction is flawed. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Rev. 835-889 (2010).ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Cerro Wire, et al. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
