Search for: "SEC v. United Communications, Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 5:03 pm
SeeImport Motors, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
Nor does the closing of a transaction in the United States, see Quail Cruise Ship Management Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:38 pm
Murex Sec., Ltd., 539 F.3d 1354, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:11 am
In Dronsejko v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Co.Zall v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
The BGEA sued in Glasgow Sheriff Court and won: SEC Ltd had discriminated against the BGEA on the basis of a protected characteristic for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Other interesting cases include Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd (Plaintiff) v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
SEC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Research in Motion Ltd., et. al. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:27 am
While a number of the incidents complained of by the hotel were insufficient to support allegations that the union coerced neutral targets or that it used coercion with the intent of forcing the neutral entities not to do business with the hotel, the appeals court found that in three instances, the union engaged in conduct that crossed the line from intent to persuade, to simply interfering with the businesses of the neutrals (520 South Michigan Avenue Associates, Ltd dba The Congress Plaza… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am
Accenture Ltd, 537 F.Supp2d 506 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) and Rayna v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
But this raises further problems because the SEC’s rule also exempts any such stockholders from the existing SEC requirement that communications made to form a group must be disclosed if more than 10 stockholders are contacted. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
VENCAP, LTD. 411 F.Supp. 1094 (1975) United States District Court, S. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:10 am
(Techdirt) Harvard’s Charlie Nesson raises Constitutional questions in RIAA litigation (ZDNet Government) Head’s up RIAA: engage these kids passions: don’t sue your market for heaven’s sake (IP ADR Blog) Electronic Arts sued repeatedly of DRM (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) United Features realises that setting comics free online makes sense (Techdirt) Do the new SEC rules on linking violate section 230 safe harbours? [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
SEC RIAs. [read post]
