Search for: "SMITH et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
The case is currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:51 am
Smith, et al., the couples alleged that so-called “second parent adoption is the only way that a family in North Carolina with gay or lesbian parents can ensure that both parents have a legal relationship with the child” and enjoy the benefits and protections “of a legally-recognized parent-child relationship with both parents. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Earl Butz, Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, et al., http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/511/331/399042/>, United State Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:28 am
The case is Ringo et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
The case of Nordyke, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The cases are Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Microsoft et al.[25] In Motionless Keyboard, the inventor of a new keyboard showed his keyboard to investors, a friend, a business partner and a typist prior to filing an application. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Amicus brief of Columbia Legal Services et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm
Shahriar, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
The District of Columbia federal courts are a frequent forum for litigating FDA issues, and they’ve been pretty friendly to the First Amendment so far.There’s also a helpful discussion of the issue in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:37 am
NBC Universal et al. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Autonomy Corp., PLC, et. al. [read post]
