Search for: "SOVEREIGN v. STATE ex rel. READ"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Vacha v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:30 pm
Snoqualmie Gaming Commission (Land into Trust; Gaming)The People ex rel. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, 785 F.3d 1207 (8th Cir. 2015) — 785_f.3d_1207 United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm
See United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
Finally, China is capable of funding these projects via sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) that invest with political goals in mind. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:19 am
Problem 9 --U.S. ex rel. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:05 am
“Judge Garland also authored an opinion narrowly reading states’ sovereign immunity from suit under the civil rights laws. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Whitehall ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
That’s from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion Hutchison ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
That’s exactly what those statutes mean, at least the specific sections of the Government Claims Act at issue in People ex rel. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
"The decision is set out below:The People of the State of New York, ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
Unlike European countries which mostly rely on large and powerful government agencies to enforce consumer protection and civil rights laws, the U.S. has relatively small government agencies which handle relatively few cases. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
The plurality acknowledges that most states continue to adhere to the public duty rule – and even in the relatively few exceptions, the legislature has in several cases acted to overturn judicial decisions abolishing or limiting the rule. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We acknowledge that if you only read the first sentence of Section 788, standing alone, Mikhail's reading makes some sense. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:02 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]