Search for: "SPECIALTY STEEL PRODUCTS, INC" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 11:59 am by @ErikJHeels
(Cambridge, MA; Nancy Ryan, President) Blue Steel Solutions, Inc [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Digital Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
According to Professor Robert Proctor, a regular testifying historian for tobacco plaintiffs, a linguist, Iain Boal, coined the term agnotology, in 1992, to describe the study of the production of ignorance.[13] The Rise of “Agnotology” in Ngram Agnotology has become a cottage sub-industry of the lawsuit industry, although lawsuits (or claim mongering if you like), of course, remain their main product. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Recently India, Inc. saw as many as 340 independent directors resigning from their positions fearing that their reputation might be at stake if the company fails to live up to investor expectations. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:52 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011), cert. denied sub nom., U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Another vacuous response to a methodological challenge under Rule 702 is to label the challenge as “going to the weight, not the admissibility” of the challenged expert witness’s testimony. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Steel’s defence basically relied on the unexpected economic downturn as justification for not honouring undertakings involving maintaining steady employment and continued steel production of two plants. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by Barry Barnett
  Lawyers in my firm routinely offer to restrict each side’s initial production of electronic documents to the five custodians that the other side chooses. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 11:56 am by admin
The Subversion of Causation into Normative Feelings The late Professor Margaret Berger argued for the abandonment of general causation, or cause-in-fact, as an element of tort claims under the law.[1] Her antipathy to the requirement of showing causation ultimately involved her deprecating efforts to inject due scientific care in gatekeeping of causation opinions. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
CSX Transportation, Inc., No. 12-1135, 2012 WL 8899119 (Cir. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]