Search for: "STATE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. POWERS" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” That’s correct given the original terms of who entered into that agreement. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
And imagine it happens relatively quickly, a possibility I explain in the final section below. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Was there an independent cause of action–separate from the allegation of ultra vires governmental action–in cases like Ex Parte Young (1908), Larson v. [read post]
Because the state tax authority issued an assessment based on its examination of the taxpayer’s books and records, an assessment is afforded a presumption of correctness.7 This presumption of correctness means that the department of revenue satisfied its prima facie requirement to establish the basis for an assessment. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
The union is the only permenancy of the department. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Q: threat of violence—should it matter whether the person is famous or just an ex? [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
True, Justice Anthony Kennedy in Boumediene v. [read post]