Search for: "STATE v COLORES"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2019, 6:23 am
CMB Entertainment, LLC et al v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:03 am
Here is the opinion in Window Rock School District v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:26 pm
Cox, Sam Houston State University, has published Gibbons v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:21 am
United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 am
The UK Court of Appeal took this matter on earlier this summer, giving trademark holders something to chew on.The case of Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd (t/a Allen & Hanburys) v Sandoz Ltd concerned a trademark registration for an asthma inhaler, and more specifically, its color scheme. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
But for many, the keystone of this arch is the Supreme Court Decision of Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
But the district court dismissed the case, ruling that the complaint did not plausibly show that defendants acted under color of state law. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 2:25 pm
In Swan Landing Development LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:08 pm
That is the question addressed today in American Express Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:43 am
This right was extended in Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
The 1870 ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution barred each state from denying the right to vote on the basis of “race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 9:01 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Constitutional Law Civil rights; color of state law Even though an alderman beat a private citizen, he did not do so under color of state law, and he cannot be sued under Section 1983. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
In re Cook Medical Technologies LLC, 105 U.S.P.Q.2d 1377 (TTAB 2012) [precedential], involving teal and blue medical devices, the Board stated in dictum that Section 18 is available to restrict the color in a registered mark. [read post]
