Search for: "STATE v. McCLUSKEY" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2013, 10:11 pm by Kirk Jenkins
I, Section 16; (3) separation of powers; or (4) the State Lawsuit Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 5/1? [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm by Bridget Crawford
Faced with persistent unemployment, a nationwide foreclosure crisis, deep cuts to state and local budgets, and declining state support for public education, Americans are questioning the promise of upward mobility. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
This argument was successfully run in McCluskey v Edge Hill University (ET Case No. 2405206/07), (although ultimately the employer succeeded in defending the claim on the basis that such a PCP amounted to a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:08 am by Lawrence Solum
Faced with persistent unemployment, a nationwide foreclosure crisis, deep cuts to state and local budgets, and declining state support for public education, Americans are questioning the promise of upward mobility. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 Their estimate is based on a 2007 CDC FoodNet survey that found ~3% of people surveyed in 10 states reported drinking raw milk in the last 7 days (25). [read post]
In their submissions to the Expert Group, the Scottish Government and the Lord Advocate had called for appeals to the Supreme Court in criminal cases to be ended altogether, so Salmond was no doubt hoping that this is what the Review Group (headed by Lord McCluskey) would recommend. [read post]
In their submissions to the Expert Group, the Scottish Government and the Lord Advocate had called for appeals to the Supreme Court in criminal cases to be ended altogether, so Salmond was no doubt hoping that this is what the Review Group (headed by Lord McCluskey) would recommend.  [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:10 am by Blog Editorial
The review group, headed by Lord McCluskey, was set up by Alex Salmond after the Supreme Court decisions in Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2011] UKSC24 and in anticipation of the decisions in HM Advocate v Ambrose, G & M. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am by Legal Beagle
”However, it should be noted Lord McCluskey’s initial report clearly states : “We do not suggest that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be ended. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:53 am by Mike
Both cases follow Cadder v HMA [2010] UKSC 43 which involved a detainee being interviewed by the police without access to legal advice. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:53 am by Mike
Both cases follow Cadder v HMA [2010] UKSC 43 which involved a detainee being interviewed by the police without access to legal advice. [read post]