Search for: "STATE v. PRASAD"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
Beatriz Busaniche, another member of Vía Libre added: The whole implementation of e-voting was imposed through an Executive Decree from the Government of the City of Buenos Aires, while the law clearly states that for the use of electronic voting, an special majority in the Legislature is needed (4894 Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
As of 1 January 2015, 109 Member States and one non-Member Observer State have extended a standing invitation to thematic special procedures. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
Durga Prasad v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:20 am
Bommai and Rameshwar Prasad v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
As well as throughout the state. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
Prasad v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 10:29 pm
In view of the conflicting views expressed in earlier cases (Shyam Nandan Prasad v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:42 am
Prasad that Dr. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
State of Haryana and another [(2003) 4 SCC 675], Nikhil Merchant v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:53 pm
Swami Prasad Maurya (February 2007) and Jagjit Singh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:07 am
Odebrecht v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:55 am
A party may decide not to pursue certain heads of damages as claimed and a settlement may be reached without addressing that particular head of damage: Prasad v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Referring to the decision of this Court in Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Vs. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
Ahmad v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
V. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:53 pm
The aforesaid propositions have been quoted with approval by this Court in Badri Prasad and others v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:54 pm
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} (The following post has been contributed by Piyush Prasad, who is an alumnus (B.Sc. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
" Section 11 deals with third party information and sub-section (1) thereof is extracted below: "(1) Where a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose any information or record, or part thereof on a request made under this Act, which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, the Central Public Information Officer or State… [read post]
