Search for: "Saint-Gobain Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 5:55 am by laborprof lpb
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.: Putting Policy Over Plain Language? [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am by Brian A. Hall
., 514 U.S. 159, 165-66, 34 USPQ2d 1161 (1995); Brunswick Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
The case was Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:18 am by Theo Lu
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court held that an employee’s oral complaint of a wage and hour violation was afforded the same protection as a written complaint. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm by Employment Services
Saint Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the Supreme Court determined that oral complaints were afforded protection from retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act.2. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:33 am by Jennifer Smith
Formed by a 2002 merger, Bingham McHale is one of Indiana’s larger law firms; clients include mall owner Simon Property Group and Saint-Gobain, a global leader in building materials. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm by admin
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., which held that the Fair Labor Standards Act shielded workers from retaliation for verbal as well as written complaints. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Cases Every Lawyer Should Study.Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:32 am by Russell Cawyer
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., (No. 09-834) (holding that an employee has engaged in protected activity under the FLSA even if his only complaint is an oral complaint)  (post here; opinion here). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which the business community had a clear interest, but in which the Chamber did not file a brief and the business community did not prevail.As I hope this post illustrates, the rush to characterize the Court as “pro” or “anti” business based on a handful of cases or even a single term inevitably results in sweeping conclusions that obscure more than they illuminate. [read post]