Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co., LTD"
Results 21 - 40
of 497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2022, 1:33 pm
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 4:31 pm
Samsung Electronics Co., where we determined that the parties’ forum selection clause did not extend to IPRs, that determination was based on the specific language in the forum selection clause at issue in that case. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
Ltd, Coranci LLC, Sol IP, Korea Telecom (KT), JVCKennwood, and now LG. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 6:58 am
Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:24 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Opposition No. 91222405 (November 9, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke) Goods/Services: The Board has often recognized that confusion is likely from the use of the same or similar marks for goods and for services involving those goods. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:31 am
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: Alibaba Apps Start Offering WeChat Pay Option After Government OrdersReuters – September 28, 2021 China’s Alibaba Group Holding Ltd has begun offering payment services from Tencent Holdings Ltd’s WeChat on a number of its apps, after the government ordered major tech firms to stop blocking each other’s services and links. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: Alibaba Apps Start Offering WeChat Pay Option After Government OrdersReuters – September 28, 2021 China’s Alibaba Group Holding Ltd has begun offering payment services from Tencent Holdings Ltd’s WeChat on a number of its apps, after the government ordered major tech firms to stop blocking each other’s services and links. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 7:49 pm
In Samsung Electronics CO., LTD v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:51 pm
Though the district court in this case relied on the co-pending case against Lyft, Inc. as well as Bumble, both of those litigations involve entirely different underlying functionality and the Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. and LG Electronics Inc. et al. litigations have now been directed to be transferred to Northern California. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:28 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Samsung Electronics Co., LTD (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:17 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:03 am
Court of Milan, January 2012 – Samsung Electronic Co. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:57 am
Samsung, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 2021-1565, urging a panel of the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 2021-1565, urging a panel of the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 am
Jan. 11, 2021) Chinese Case: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:24 am
Top Five Patent Application Filers in 2020 27,135 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD 16,958 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMM CORP 16,678 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15,475 LG CHEM LTD 15,162 QUALCOMM INC For decades, commercial pharmaceutical industries have been locking up IP related to life-saving drugs by prolonging the period of patents and coming up with intangible or unconscionable secondary patents. [read post]
