Search for: "Samuel Harms"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,096
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
“Our decision returns the issue of abortion to those legislative bodies,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito, author of the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Treating these women when they arrive at the emergency room results in a variety of harms for the physicians there, the challengers explain. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
We believe that a particular court decision is wrong in the moral sense--that it violates someone's rights or that its on balance effect is harmful. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Supreme Court seemed prepared to reject a Republican-led effort to sharply limit the federal government from pressuring social media companies to remove harmful posts and misinformation from their platforms. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
Facebook has a lot of opinions on its own about various kinds of communications it thinks harmful. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:49 pm
” Justice Sonia Sotomayor questioned the respondents’ claim that they were harmed because the posts at issue were not produced by the respondents directly but were instead instances of misinformation that the respondents wanted to repost. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm
Justice Samuel Alito pressed Cole to better define “coercion. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
By: Kirk Nahra , Arianna Evers , Ali Jessani , Genesis Ruano , and Samuel Kane , WILMERHALE This article is intended to give privacy officers and other privacy professionals an overview of how commercial privacy issues are regulated in the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
Stretch said that most cases of moderating content that has the potential of offline harm do not have a political lens and do not have strong advocates against the content’s suppression, as in the case of content promoting child sexual abuse or terrorism. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
Three justices – Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch – dissented from the court’s decision to temporarily block Doughty’s order, calling it “unreasoned” and “highly disturbing. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
So six justices, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed with heart of the reasoning in the per curiam opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
So six justices, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed with heart of the reasoning in the per curiam opinion. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:16 am
Without the policy in place, Virginia Tech reasoned, Speech First and its members cannot be harmed. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:03 pm
NAB contends that the rules are “burdensome” in nature and address a “phantom harm” that has not been well-documented. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Thus, recognition of the right to same-sex marriage not only does not harm people who oppose same-sex marriage; it affirmatively benefits them.Expanding the circle of right-holders in other ways can also benefit existing right-holders who might think of themselves as harmed by that expansion. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
(This point was made in a 2021 law review article by former FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra and current FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Samuel Levine.) [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[28] She concluded that Israel’s efforts to mitigate civilian harm and “a careful examination of Israel’s war policy and of the full statements of the responsible government officials further demonstrates the absence of a genocidal intent. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent working paper, Samuel Hampsher-Monk, Managing Director of BOTEC Analysis, argues that this smoking–vaping paradox is solvable. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
Justice Samuel Alito wrote a forceful dissent to denial of certiorari, warning that the lower court ruling sets a dangerous precedent (I raised similar concerns myself, as did Judge Allison Jones Rushing in her dissent to the Fourth Circuit ruling): A group representing applicants for admission to a highly competitive public magnet school brought suit, claiming that changes in the school's admissions requirements violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
” And there is nothing any state or the federal government can do to change other states’ decisions about how to appoint electors in this regard, so this “daunting” feature is not likely to change anytime soon, unless we eliminate the electoral college system itself.In another exchange, Justice Samuel Alito, coming from the other direction, wondered not whether states would engage in tit-for-tat retaliation, but instead whether, if Colorado’s decision were… [read post]
