Search for: "Sandoz, Inc. "
Results 21 - 40
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 12:08 pm
The reference product, Neupogen®, which brought maker Amgen Inc. $1.4 billion in sales in 2013, is a biologic used […] [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 4:53 am
Sandoz By Kevin E. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:46 pm
On September 28, Bayer won a dismissal of U.S. antitrust claims that were made against it by Sandoz Inc. [read post]
6 May 2013, 4:33 pm
On May 1, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an interesting, yet controversial, ruling in Allergan Inc. v Sandoz Inc. et Al., examining obviousness in the context of a combination ophthalmic drug treatment. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 6:00 pm
Sandoz Inc. that an "appellate court must apply a 'clear error,' not de novo, standard of review" to the evidentiary underpinnings of a district court's claim construction determination. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:46 pm
By James DeGiulio -- Endo Settles with Impax and Sandoz in Opana Patent Suits Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. has settled patent infringement suits against Sandoz Inc. and Impax Laboratories Inc. over generic versions of painkiller Opana ER. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:27 am
”); TRW Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Sandoz, Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:18 pm
Sandoz Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 pm
Sandoz Inc. (2015)"). [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringement by Sandoz Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey of ALIMTA®, Patent No. 7,772,209, which was issued by the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The present case started as a claim for infringement brought by Astellas Pharma Inc (“Astellas”) against Teva and Sandoz (the “Defendants”). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
Sandoz, Inc., No. 13-854, slip op., 574 U.S. __ (2015). [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 3:39 am
Sandoz, Inc., No. 05 C 5373, 2006 WL 3718025 (N.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:25 pm
Sandoz, Inc.) was that an inordinate proportion of claim construction decisions were overturned in whole or part. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
Sandoz, Inc., Sandoz International GMBH, Sandoz GMBH, holding that Sandoz failed to prove that the asserted claims were invalid for obviousness-type double patenting (ODP), failure to meet the written description requirement, and obviousness for lack of motivation to combine the prior art references. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:16 pm
Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 6:14 am
Substantively, in Sandoz, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
Sandoz Inc. [read post]
