Search for: "Schult v. Schult" Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by Leila Rafei
Learn more about the case:https://www.aclu.org/cases/bert-v-oconnor Stay informed about our workSign up [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Goldstein, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Tags: Beneficial owners, Corporate Transparency Act, Disclosure, Financial regulation, FinCEN, LLCs, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation, Transparency When a Company Takes a Stand, What is the Board’s Role? [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Ludmer In Law Society of Upper Canada v Brian Allan Ludmer, 2012 ONLSHP 191 and Law Society of Upper Canada v Brian Allan Ludmer, 2013 ONLSHP 114, Mr. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 A.D.3d 538, 538-39 (1st Dep’t 2019) i Barrett v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Judge Edmead explains: “The lack of an attorney-client relationship bars a legal malpractice claim (Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 AD3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
The Genetic Literacy Project (GLP) asks: “Who is David and who is Goliath in the lobbying battle over agricultural biotechnology? [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP  2019 NY Slip Op 07510 Decided on October 17, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department illustrates to bedrock principles of legal malpractice. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant’s assertion that he was reviewing the invoices is too general to defeat the claim (see Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500, 501 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 702 [2 [read post]