Search for: "Schwartz v. F. B. I"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2017, 8:03 am
Adair, 764 F.3d 347, 359 (4th Cir. 2014); Karhu v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:32 pm
Schwartz, 131 F.2d 805, 808 (7th Cir. 1942). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
Schwartz is a talented scientist with whom I had the privilege and pleasure to work at McCarter & English, before he left to become an independent scientific consultant. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
I didn’t come up with that — the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, predecessor to the Federal Circuit — did, in a well-known case called Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
§2B1.1(b)(11)(C), because this provision does not apply to personal tax returns. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Mirvis, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, June 3, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Acquisition premiums, Arbitrage, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Leveraged acquisitions, Management, Merger litigation, Private equity, Shareholder value The Effect of Staggered Boards on Stock Value: New Evidence Posted by Yakov Amihud, New York University Stern School of Business, on Saturday, June 4, 2016 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
And here is our reply to that: B. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
I think—it is a technical issue. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
Argument I. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
Schwartz’s discussion is well worth reading in its entirety, but I wanted to emphasize some of Dr. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
Elliott and David B. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Chief Justice Rehnquist no doubt spoke for most judges and lawyers in expressing his discomfort with the notion that courts would have to actually look at science (rather than qualifications, demeanor, and credibility)[17]: “I defer to no one in my confidence in federal judges; but I am at a loss to know what is meant when it is said that the scientific status of a theory depends on its ‘falsifiability’, and I suspect some of them will be, too. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Yes, I plan to share my strong views about California’s privacy regulatory efforts at this hearing, and no, I don’t plan to mince words (though I have promised the organizer that I try not to drop any f-bombs at the hearing). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:05 pm
Emens, Elizabeth F. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm
I am pleased to publish below a guest post written by Robert F. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
http://bit.ly/RN4gfL (@OrangeLT) Case In Point: 30(B)(6) Witnesses? [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:47 am
Schwartz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
I have it as text for you. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
Moreover, a claim predicated on mutual mistake must be pleaded with the requisite particularity necessitated under CPLR 3016(b). [read post]
