Search for: "Seagate Technology LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 9:24 am
., the United States Supreme Court did what much of the patent world expected it would do, which is overrule the Federal Circuit's "unduly rigid" test for the awarding of enhanced damages for willful damages put in place by In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360, 1371 (2007)(en banc). [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ On its face, the statute allows for broad discretion by the district courts, but the Federal Circuit set out a stricter standard for awarding of enhanced damages, as In re Seagate Technology LLC. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Apple Inc., No 15-777 (design patent damages calculation) Argued: Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Apple Inc., No 15-777 (design patent damages calculation) Argued: Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:50 pm
Compaq Computer Corp., Seagate Technology, Inc., and Seagate Technology, LLC. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:05 am
In both cases, the Federal Circuit held that enhanced damages were not available under that court’s 2007 decision in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, which permits enhanced damages only upon clear and convincing evidence of objectively reckless willfulness. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
Manufacturers and the uses of technology are using the same concept now to co [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
Currently, under the standard set out by the Federal Circuit in In re Seagate Technology LLC, an enhanced damages award under § 284 requires clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent, and (2) that this objectively-defined risk was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer. [read post]
CAFC in Shukh: concrete and particularized reputational injury can give rise to Article III standing
2 Oct 2015, 11:08 am
Seagate Tech., LLC, No. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
SSL Servs., LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm
., Inc. 902619386 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to General Electric Company 902619394 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Exxon Mobil Corp. 902619493 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Texas Instruments Inc 902619519 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Amgen Inc. 902619527 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Goldcorp Inc. 902619535 UBS Yield… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
In Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:51 pm
”In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:09 am
Although nothing in [In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
In 2007, sitting en banc, it established a heightened standard for willfulness that included an inquiry into whether a defendant's actions were "objectively reckless" in In re Seagate Technology LLC. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:49 am
Seagate Tech., LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
., Seagate Technology, LLC., and Seagate Technology, Inc. did not misappropriate 11 of 15 alleged trade secrets from Convolve, Inc. [read post]
