Search for: "Seaman v State of New York"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The employment contract contained a forum clause (the Seaman’s country of citizenship, here Nicaragua) and a choice of law clause designating the law of the flag state of the vessel (Bahamian). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Nga Trinh Issue: Whether a person engaged in a maritime trade, who is not a seaman or a longshore worker, is a "seafarer" under Yamaha Motor Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
The concealed carry ban in the new state of Kentucky was soon ruled unconstitutional in Bliss v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
Workers based in New York and New Jersey sometimes worked 70 hours a week but were paid for 40 of them. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:18 am
A New York Times op-ed raised a serious question, does factual innocence matter anymore? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
For those who desire an annotated journey through the President's speech, you may find the following of some value: here (New York Times), here (The Washington Post), and here (NPR). [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
The Clearing House Ass'n, L.L.C. (08-453), on whether 12 USC § 484 and 12 CFR § 7.4000 prohibit measures taken by the New York State Attorney General to enforce state fair lending law against national banks by subjecting those entities to "visitorial powers. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The District Court made the following rulings pertinent to international litigation and dispute resolution: First, the case was properly removed from state to federal court by reason of the New York Convention. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:16 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Women could vote in New Jersey and free Blacks voted on the same basis as Whites in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, and probably in Connecticut and Maryland was well.[5] In the fall of 1788, the eleven ratifying states elected Representative and Senators, and voted for the new president. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Sept. 11, 2009), the plaintiff seaman was allowed, in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
Lyft, Inc., for example, the court focused on the particular nature of Lyft operations in the New York Tri-State Area. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
However, in their new article, Misappropropriation on a Global Scale: Extraterritoriality and Applicable Law in Transborder Trade Secrecy Cases, Professors Rochelle Dreyfuss and Linda Silberman of New York University School of Law cast doubt on the assumption that Section 1837 authorizes such broad extraterritorial reach. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
However, in their new article, Misappropropriation on a Global Scale: Extraterritoriality and Applicable Law in Transborder Trade Secrecy Cases, Professors Rochelle Dreyfuss and Linda Silberman of New York University School of Law cast doubt on the assumption that Section 1837 authorizes such broad extraterritorial reach. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
The appeal to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“District Court”) then followed. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
Bran Carroll replied effectively on this point at argument today; for a more detailed analysis, see my posting of yesterday on the Confrontation Blog, analyzing one of the amicus briefs in the case.http://confrontationright.blogspot.com/2011/12/thoughts-on-brief-of-new-york-da-and.html. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:16 pm
Viens (Queen Mary, University of London) The Neuroscience of Fair Play: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Altruistic Behaviours and Their FailuresDonald Pfaff (Rockefeller University, New York) Brain Images As Legal EvidenceAdina Roskies and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Dartmouth College) 13.15 LUNCH 14:15 SESSION III: The Illusion of Intentionality and Its Implications for Criminal LawColin Blakemore (Nuffield Department of Clinical Sciences, Oxford… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am
Rantanen and Chris Seaman Professors Rantanen and Seaman take a statutory and historical approach in their argument that willfulness is the appropriate standard for determining whether damages should be enhanced. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
