Search for: "Securus Technologies" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
The decision is consistent with recent trends at the Court, reviewing both district court obviousness determinations as well as those by the PTAB at the USPTO (see "Securus Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 8:16 pm by Patent Docs
By Michael Borella -- Over the last 18 months, the Federal Circuit has been quietly shoring up the non-obviousness provisions of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:30 am by Mark Engstrom
To the extent that the Board provided a reasoned explanation for its obviousness rejection of the remaining 23 claims, the ruling was affirmed (Securus Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
  Two privately owned companies, Global Tel*Link and Securus Technologies control 70% of the market. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:06 am
  Two privately owned companies, Global Tel*Link and Securus Technologies control 70% of the market. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Jon Brodkin
A ruling on Wednesday from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted a petition for a stay filed by Securus Technologies. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:55 am by Jon Brodkin
Prison phone companies Global Tel*Link (GTL) and Securus Technologies had argued that the FCC's limits fell short of what the companies are contractually obligated to pay in "site commissions" to correctional facilities. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Jon Brodkin
 Securus Technologies CEO Richard Smith argued that confusion about the rate caps could cause "chaos and confusion" in prisons, threatening security. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:49 am by Jon Brodkin
Securus Technologies CEO Richard Smith filed an affidavit in federal appeals court yesterday, arguing that the FCC has misinterpreted the court order and that imposing the rate caps on intrastate calls will cause problems in prisons and jails. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Jon Brodkin
Global Tel*Link (GTL) and Securus Technologies had asked the US Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia to stay new price regulations until a lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission is decided, arguing that they have a high likelihood of prevailing in the case. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:51 am by Aaron Mackey and Dave Maass
In addition, users of these systems face potential privacy violations, as illustrated by the recent Securus data breach of more than 70-million prisoner phone calls. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm by Bill Budington and Cooper Quintin
There were other significant incidents affecting the private sector, most notably Ashley Madison, Anthem, Experian, Hello Kitty, HSBC, Securus Technologies, and VTech. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
In a sane world, a patent examiner would apply common sense and reject Securus’ application out of hand. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Daniel Nazer
Securus’ claims are just an abstract idea implemented on generic technology. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:01 am by SHG
AN ENORMOUS CACHE of phone records obtained by The Intercept reveals a major breach of security at Securus Technologies, a leading provider of phone services inside the nation’s prisons and jails. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
It claims Securus’ patents “mimic available consumer products, like Apple’s FaceTime, and a ‘range of other technology’ that was well known long before Securus’ patent applications were filed. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:52 am by Dave Maass
Before Securus proceeds with its expansion plans, it should immediately remove these clauses. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:20 am by Docket Navigator
" Petition for Inter Partes Review by Securus Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00153 (PTAB May 1, 2015, Order) (Boucher, APJ) The Board declined to institute inter partes review of a patent claiming a spinal stabilization device on obviousness grounds because the petition failed to establish that an asserted reference was prior art under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In Austin, activists are pushing for the Sheriff to allow face-to-face visitation for county jail inmates, a practice ended as part of a new contract with Dallas-based Securus Technologies which provides for video-based visitation only. [read post]