Search for: "Segal v. SEGAL" Results 21 - 40 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
 As happens today to Davis Wright Tremaine associate Jonathan Segal:"In oral argument before this panel, Jonathan Segal, counsel for appellant, disclosed confidential information related to offers made by his opponent in mediation before the Ninth Circuit Mediation Program. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am by Paul Caron
Eric Segall (Georgia State), Political Polarization, Legal Education, and a Few Modest but Serious Proposals: Twenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 11:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Invoking the attorney - client privilegeThe primary issue in this appeal is whether attorneys who have sought the advice of their law firm's in-house general counsel on their ethical obligations in representing a firm client may successfully invoke attorney-client privilege to resist the client's demand for the disclosure of communications seeking or giving such advice.Stock v Schnader Harrison Segal and Lewis LLP, 2016 NY Slip Op 05247, Appellate Division, First… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:55 pm
" And today at "Dorf on Law," Eric Segall has a post titled "Text All The Way Down: Why the Government Should Prevail in King v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
Teaching criminal law at Fordham Law School, John Pfaff posts at PrawfsBlawg about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Cavazos v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm by Christopher J. Walker
Earlier this week I sat down with Eric Segall to participate in his Supreme Myths podcast. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Noted Supreme Court critic Eric Segall has been criticizing the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
I note how the recorded votes in Missouri v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:04 pm by Amy Howe
Briefly: In an op-ed for JURIST, David Cortman discusses the significance of the Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]