Search for: "Self-Powered Lighting, Ltd. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
  Consider the role of fiduciary duty and monitoring and due diligence obligations of enterprises in light of changing jurisprudence. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
These decisions, along with Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7806. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
not sufficiently distinctive to qualify for trade mark protection (Class 46)   Guernsey Guernsey: the offshore jurisdiction of choice for IP rights (IP Frontline)   India The power to suspend operation of a patent: IPAB’s stay of operation of Ramkumar’s patent covering dual SIM phones (Spicy IP) USPTO to use Indian traditional knowledge database (Managing Intellectual Property) (Spicy IP) (Securing Innovation) Madras High Court records issues in Bajaj-TVS patent… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
 This not what happened in Adobe Systems Incorporated v Netcom Online.Co.UK Ltd & Another [2012] EWHC 446 (Ch), 2 March 2012, a decision of Mr Justice Warren (Chancery Division, England and Wales), concerning a consent agreement that become not so much the end of an old dispute as the beginning of a new one. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The motion judge instead relied on Morguard Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece on misinformation and how roughly one third of social media users across the United States, as well as Argentina, Germany, South Korea, Spain and United Kingdom, reported seeing false or misleading information about coronavirus. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
CPSO and Investigatory Powers Nina Bombier of Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP provided an overview of Gore v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]