Search for: "Shaver v. Shaver" Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"IPBiz has made several followup comments, including Patent jacking, sole inventors, Edison's light bulb and the upcoming patent interference on CRISPR There is a law review article by Lea Shaver, Illuminating Innovation: From Patent Racing to Patent War, 69 Wash & Lee L. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:36 pm
Shaver, 2007 BCSC 54.Benjamin John Mott signed his last Will and Testament on March 16, 2004. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:15 am by Jonathan Stroud
This week, district courts saw 91 new complaints, a large portion filed by IP Edge subsidiaries, such as Karetek Holdings, LLC; Guada Technologies; Tunnel IP, LLC; Altair Logix, LLC; Coretek Licensing, LLC; and Raindrops Licensing, LLC, with the rest being Intellectual Ventures selloffs, company-to-company disputes (like the Skull Shaver, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:46 am
("Shaver Motors"). * * * We conclude that the LALJ did not err in deciding the case without the predecessor employer as a party or in concluding that Anderson Pontiac acquired substantially all of the assets of Shaver Motors. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm by John McFarland
In December last year, the Texas Supreme Court wrote on that case, No. 17-0332, Barrow-Shaver Resources v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 3:55 am by SHG
Ordinary people shouldn’t have to be learned in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by InvestorLawyers
Steve and Mike Shaver founded Mountain V Oil & Gas Inc. in March of 1994. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 11:30 am by luiza
 An image from the government’s complaint shows the difference (U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
There has even been recent fuss online of a man observed shaving his head while driving, but nobody is suggesting that electric shavers should be banned too. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Bill Ruthhart of the Indianapolis Star reports this afternoon on the Supreme Court decision earlier today in the case of City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]