Search for: "Short et al v. Brown University" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mike, it's not solo inventors or patent trolls that are flooding the USPTO with incremental concepts; it's IBM, Microsoft, Cisco, Apple, et al. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Overview of the No-Fly List The ACLU’s lawsuit, Latif et al v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
If a compleat supremacy some where is not necessary in every Society, a controuling power at least is so, by which the general authority may be defended against encroachments of the subordinate authorities.Without a sweeping national veto, even in matters of seemingly local concern, states would be able to “oppress the weaker party within their respective jurisdictions,” he concluded.[7] The Constitution, too weak, had fallen short. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  Byrnes’s The Supreme Court Must Be Curbed (1956), unless the monograph was particularly short, as in the case of William Howard Taft’s eight-page work The Obligations of Victory (1918) or his twenty-four-page work The Progressive World Struggle of the Jews for Civil Equality (1919). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
Mary Bilder tells me that no one was more infuriated by Crosskey’s opus than the folks at Harvard Law School (Henry Hart, et al.). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
” (1) Thus, they are the axiomatic and universally accepted legal norms that bind all nations under jus gentium (law of nations). [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
   Within a short time frame, small- and medium-scale farmers, processors, and distributors will fall victim to its business-busting and job-killing requirements.Furthermore, this self-styled safety reform will make our food less safe, not more. [read post]