Search for: "Simmons v. I. C. C"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
That clearly violated Simmons v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
[Disclosure: colleagues at Simmons&Simmons acted on this case].2. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
Did I read that right? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:00 am
Simmons. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event I WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar I UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger I Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
C. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
[C.] [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
Mitchell, for Discover Bank, Appellee.Anderson McLay "Andy" Simmons, for Shawn C. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am
This call is for Mike Simmons, I need you to return this call as soon as you get this message 877-333-3880 extension 2571. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
Brill’s approach focuses on the dangers of counterfeit goods for certain consumer products, such pharmaceuticals.The Red Bull colours: no trade mark registration for indeterminate colour combinationKatfriend Darren Meale (Simmons&Simmons) explains the joined Cases T-101/15 and T-102/15 Red Bull v EUIPO. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
More unfair advantage, but only where the goods are “luxury” enoughKenzo Tsujimoto v EUIPO, Joined Cases C‑85/16 P and C‑86/16 P, CJEU (May 2018)Kenzo is a French fashion house with Japanese roots. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:33 am
Based on Darren Meale’s popular Retromark blog posts (Volume I and Volume II), the event will be held at the London offices of Simmons & Simmons near Moorgate. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
ROBERTS, C. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:18 am
Tennessee: Victims Triumphant David Bruck, Simmons v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:06 pm
United States, 941 F.2d 1488, 1492-1493 (11th Cir.1991); Simmons v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
A panel consisting of Prof Graeme Dinwoodie (Oxford University), Simon Malynicz QC (3 New Square) and David Stone (Simmons & Simmons) promises to "deep dive into the real meat of the reforms" [Mmm...trade mark meat... [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
From Comcast v. [read post]
