Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
Service providers beware! [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 am
Indeed, neither Nunez nor Smith disclosed any communications; instead the Government obtained them through the service of a search and seizure warrant on a third-party that hosted Nunez's email account. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:10 pm
” Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to file an amicus brief in the consolidated appeals of Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Smith Generating Station coal-fired CFB Boiler Project (Smith), Conoco Phillips and Peabody's Kentucky NewGas Synthetic Natural Gas Production plant (NewGas), and Cash Creek Generation LLC's coal-fired Cash Creek Generating Station (Cash Creek). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:16 am
Take-Home Flexibilities Generally, OTP patients have been required to make daily in-person visits to their OTPs for medication dispensing/administration. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:19 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Watkins-Singh, R (on the application of) v The Governing Body of Aberdare Girls’ High School & Anor [2008] EWHC 1865 (Admin) (29 July 2008) Pinnington, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2008] EWHC 1870 (Admin) (31 July 2008) AV & AU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 1895 (Admin) (31 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Prudential Plc… [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:24 am
Governing Law WFS’s terms were subject to general maritime law/Federal law of the US, alternatively, Florida law. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:09 am
By joining the Third Circuit in Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
’ Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
” Microsoft Corp. v. i4i L. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380 (17 April 2008) Manchester City Council v Moran & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 378 (17 April 2008) TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd & Ors v Lanwall Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 382 (17 April 2008) Duffield & Anor v Gandy [2008] EWCA Civ 379 (17 April 2008) Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374 (16 April 2008) A v Essex County Council [2008]… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
By: Daniel Davis and Farzad Panjshiri [8/1/22] Generic terms—terms that are primarily understood to be the name of a product or service—cannot be trademarks. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v St. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:09 am
Robinson-Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:42 pm
In Rizzuti v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Petitioner's contentions concerning other alleged adverse employment actions are not properly before us inasmuch as the adverse action alleged in the complaint filed with SDHR is limited to the RPD's failure to issue petitioner a smaller service weapon (see generally 9 NYCRR 465.3 [c] [3]) and there is no evidence that either petitioner or the SDHR amended the complaint to expand the scope of the case (see 9 NYCRR 465.4 [a], [c]; see generally Matter of Niagara… [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Petitioner's contentions concerning other alleged adverse employment actions are not properly before us inasmuch as the adverse action alleged in the complaint filed with SDHR is limited to the RPD's failure to issue petitioner a smaller service weapon (see generally 9 NYCRR 465.3 [c] [3]) and there is no evidence that either petitioner or the SDHR amended the complaint to expand the scope of the case (see 9 NYCRR 465.4 [a], [c]; see generally Matter of Niagara… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
(4) The Cal Supremes cited with approval a number of cases that held that employees fell within the administrative exemption, including Miller and the following other federal cases: Smith v. [read post]
