Search for: "Smith v. Hill et al" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD4902 .D48 2013Harry Woolf et al., De Smith’s Judicial Review, 7th ed. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the Eastern District of Virginia’s ruling in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
KnowlesDocket: 11-1450Issue(s): Whether, after Smith v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]