Search for: "Smith v. Nixon"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:32 am
Smith’s team has argued that Ford’s pardon — and Nixon’s acceptance of it — demonstrates that both understood that Nixon was not already immune....And:A lawyer for former President Donald J. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
Private citizen Jack Smith lacks standing to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari before judgement in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Past practice--including in the Nixon tapes case and Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Special Counsel Jack Smith has concluded that he can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that several private lawyers acted as co-conspirators in former President Donald Trump’s criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Then came Richard Nixon. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
Richard Nixon did not merely compile an enemies list. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
Finally, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:14 pm
But, apparently, there was a Nixon Court, and Nixon judges. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Nixon, 263 N.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In Nixon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
Smith. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm
It is 1:07 p.m. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
In Branch v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
In response, the Nixon Administration took action to address this new threat to the safety and welfare of our citizens. [read post]
