Search for: "Smith v. Real Estate Agency" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
  That’s what Heath Haussamen, editor and publisher of NMPolitics.net, did after the New Mexico Spaceport Authority in 2017 refused to hand over basic public records related to the private companies that lease real estate at Spaceport America, the much-publicized commercial launchpad just outside Truth or Consequences, N.M. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am by Patrick W. Krechowski, Esq.
If you own operate a business, rent to commercial tenants, develop real estate or even just own a parcel containing a single-family home, chances are, you are going to have to seek some sort of regulatory approval from a local government. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
Struggling Real Estate Developers May Get Power To Tax You Along the lines of the strange and perhaps outrageous, there’s an article in the Dallas Morning News reporting that the Dallas City Council is considering (today 2/11/09) giving real estate developers the power to tax Dallas-Fort Worth residents. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
The Civil Procedure Rules and the case of Chesters Accommodation Agency v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Smith-Snagg, 793 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
For him the better analogy is the land patent – creating a right in real estate that could not exist without the grant from the sovereign. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:18 pm by Richard Hunt
Even today from time to time real estate brokers, leasing agencies and others just put in an advertisement that they won’t rent to some group because of ethnicity or religion. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  Defendants had no in-state offices, real estate, were not registered to do business, had no address, phone numbers, bank accounts, or employees.Google Inc. v. [read post]