Search for: "Smith v. Schwartz"
Results 21 - 40
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2007, 6:48 am
” Fortune also interviewed Microsoft GC Brad Smith and licensing chief Horacio Gutierrez, who discussed their plans to get free and open-source software (FOSS) users to pay royalties. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Schwartz 11. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law at UCLA Law School. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:48 pm
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 6:10 am
The case is Lisa Kwesell et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:30 pm
The trial of Perry v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:05 pm
Not surprising, given that the Supreme Court has not been able to settle on hard core doctrine, and even now -- some 80+ years since the modern recognition of the doctrine in Pennsylvania Coal v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
Painter, quoting Smith v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 1:07 pm
So held Judge Schwartz in Chapinoff v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
– Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O’Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News Blurred Lines v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am
Norwegian goes on to cite the decision in Armor Screen Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:57 am
” At Forbes’s Full Disclosure blog, Daniel Fisher discusses the three major class-action cases of the Term: Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
The Comptroller is vested with the exclusive authority to resolve applications for retirement benefits and the "determination must be upheld if [the] interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887, 888 [3d Dept 2002] [internal citations omitted]; accord Matter of O'Brien v DiNapoli, 116 AD3d 1124, 1125 [3d Dept… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
The Comptroller is vested with the exclusive authority to resolve applications for retirement benefits and the "determination must be upheld if [the] interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887, 888 [3d Dept 2002] [internal citations omitted]; accord Matter of O'Brien v DiNapoli, 116 AD3d 1124, 1125 [3d Dept… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
