Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Navy"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
(relisted after the October 12 conference) United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State as the employer in the Classified Service2 and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm
’” The State Department has not confirmed who was responsible for the airstrike on the camp. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
Circuit to extend Department [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
Juni v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
The United States has condemned Iran over the attacks in Kurdistan and Syria, calling them as “reckless and imprecise. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm
The United States Navy, and its private contractor shipyards, had a seemingly endless appetite for amosite, in the form of blankets, and later in the form of pre-molded pipecovering insulation (such as Unibestos). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that the Civil Service Reform Act barred such a suit brought by Jason Payne, a civilian employee of the Department of the Navy. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Having spent my time and energy on the first seven cases, I’m going to be fairly summary for the last six; Smith v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
