Search for: "Smith v. Weinstein"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Griesa from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd v The Weinstein Company L.L.C. et al, 1:13-cv-05488. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Mirvis, William Savitt, and Sabastian V. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:44 am
., Inc. v Grimaldi 2024 NY Slip Op 32966(U) August 23, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157238/2021 Judge: Judy H. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Subodh Mishra, ISS STOXX, on Monday, December 2, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Incentives, Russell 3000, S&P 500 Supermajority Requirement Inapplicable in the Context of a Reincorporation to Nevada Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, December 3, 2024 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware Court of Chancery, Gunderson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Subodh Mishra, ISS STOXX, on Monday, December 2, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Incentives, Russell 3000, S&P 500 Supermajority Requirement Inapplicable in the Context of a Reincorporation to Nevada Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, December 3, 2024 Tags: Delaware articles, Delaware Court of Chancery, Gunderson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Supp.2d 230 (E.D.N.Y. 2007), Judge Weinstein (who literally “wrote the book” about federal evidence) held that a jury “may be guided” not only by partisan experts, but also by “the more neutral expert opinion of the FDA,” which had approved the product. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
We would like to thank Reed Smith’s Kevin Hara for helping to put this together.Daimler AG v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Coffee discussed dueling class actions and the ruling in Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
Salmon (duty of loyalty) Smith v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Cathay Smith, University of Montana Blewett School of Law Weaponizing Copyright Pure suppression: Dr. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Tracy v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
But see DeLuca v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Smith (EY Center for Board Matters) and Joe Dettmann (Ernst & Young LLP), on Wednesday, April 24, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Human capital, Management, Oversight, Stakeholders Claims Based on Warranty and Indemnity Liability (W&I) Policies Posted by Joseph A. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Slip op. at 10-11. (2) Enterprise liability failed (it’s never actually been recognized by anybody anywhere since Judge Weinstein dreamed it up back in 1972) because the product was governmentally regulated (by the FDA) rather than left in the hands of an industry trade association. [read post]
