Search for: "Snap-on, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am by Kevin Goldberg
I was one of many who traveled (in my case, on foot) to the United States Supreme Court on April 22, 2019 to watch oral arguments in the case of Food Marketing Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:37 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  See, e.g., Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, et al., Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and Brief amici curiae of National Association of Convenience Stores, et al. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm by Mark Walsh
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., about whether the Hobbs Act requires a [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am by Scott Sternberg
§ 1441, “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Importantly, the Report is the only publica­tion of its kind in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:22 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
., of Coppel, Texas filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant, Menard, Inc., of Eau Claire, Wisconsin infringed its rights in United States Patent No. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:08 am by Robert Laplaca
Forrest of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York issued a well-analyzed Opinion in the case Goldman v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“AGIS”)appeals the decision of the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of Florida in Advanced GroundInformation Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
As Thomas explains, in Google, Inc. v Oracle America, No. 14-410 a petition for a writ of certiorari was finally denied since Google failed to convince the US Supreme Court to hear the case. [read post]