Search for: "Snipes v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 8:05 am
United States, No. 10-5258. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991). [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:55 pm
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:37 pm
Snipes. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
" PROSECUTOR V. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:13 am
United States and Gall v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Biden, 22-1225Issues: (1) Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
United States, the Court held that a federal sentencing court must determine whether “an offense under State law” is a “serious drug offense” by consulting the “maximum term of imprisonment” applicable to a defendant’s prior state drug offense at the time of the defendant’s conviction for that offense. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:28 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
After pretty much giving the full “snipe hunt” treatment to Pruitt v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:19 pm
Ed. 2d 639 (1980) (quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:14 am
Erhard Milch), and NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 2:40 am
” However, when the Respondent registered the domain name the Complainant had no trademark in any country; and, in the United States it had abandoned its application in “the face of … a preliminary refusal of the application on the ground that the mark was descriptive. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:33 pm
" United States v. [read post]
