Search for: "Software Research, Inc. v. Developer Express Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lawson Software, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:52 am
¶ 6).2 Because this evidence raises the possibility that discov ery might have uncovered the requisite contacts under our precedent, see, e.g., Nuance Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Ultramercial, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
IPOS (Intellectual Property Office of Singapore) Express: * Case Summary – Bigfoot Internet Ventures Pte Ltd v Apple Inc.Bigfoot Internet Ventures had put up an application for revocation of a trade mark “SHERLOCK” (referred to as the “Mark”) registered in the name of Apple Inc., claiming it was not put to use in Singapore for five years.Sherlock was a software application integrated into version 8.5 of the Macintosh… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 2:06 pm
" Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:27 am
As of September 17, 2007, Linden Research, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
” But compare: Compulife Software Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Cordis that focuses on whether “the equitable defense of laches [may be used to] bar legal claims for damages that are timely under the express terms of the Patent Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:39 pm
DOJ and later in Universal City Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
OpenAI, et al., 24-cv-1514 (S.D.N.Y.); The Intercept Media, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
Last week the Guardian and New York Times ran stories claiming that NSA and its UK counterpart GCHQ have developed or employed means to crack the security being used to protect the privacy of personal data, online transactions, e-mails and other internet communications. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
As we explained in our initial Comments, U.S. courts have addressed the legality of non-expressive uses of copyrighted works in the context of other copy-reliant technologies, including software reverse engineering,[2] plagiarism detection software,[3] and the digitization of millions of library books to enable meta-analysis, text data mining, and search engine indexing.[4] Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am
Regulatory process has become burdensome, particularly upon renewal; permanent exceptions may not have adequately foreseen developments. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:12 am
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals in Dallas said distributor JTW Medical Products Inc. was acting outside the scope of its contract with a health care provider when its president allegedly gave a patient's husband faulty information. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:30 am
Patent No. 6,772,142 owned by the Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. and entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COLLECTING AND EXPRESSING GEOGRAPHICALLY-REFERENCED DATA. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
