Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Cleburne Living Center (1985) Rehnquist Court: South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Cleburne Living Center (1985) Rehnquist Court: South Dakota v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
In the 1987 case, South Dakota v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
Here, the leading precedent in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 pm
In other instances, Congress’s reliance on the executive branch to dole out the money appropriated by the legislature has left d [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
On one hand, it is clear from cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Whitt v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
Supreme Court held that Congress may, within reasonable limits, attach conditions to federal funding provided to states in South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:09 am
That decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:15 am
., South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
In putting the contingency claims forward, the government rests on the Supreme Court’s 1998 case Texas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
In Galarza v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:57 am
The Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
The two alcohol-related cases most firmly established in the canon and reproduced in whole or in part in virtually every Con Law casebook are South Dakota v. [read post]