Search for: "State v. All" Results 21 - 40 of 126,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
On the issue of obviousness, the traditional Pozzoli analysis did not easily apply since Meade J found all features of the claims would occur to the skilled person upon reading Collins with Kern. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
” Since everything is possible given money and time there is in effect no exception at all. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:14 am
Excess clauses generally state that the policy will only cover liability in excess of the coverage amount provided by all other valid and collectible policies, up to the limits of the policy containing the excess clause. [read post]