Search for: "State v. Felix"
Results 21 - 40
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
and for its discussion of Felix Frankfurter. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
This blog was co-authored by Felix Le Roux, Candidate Attorney. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:55 am
In Aponte v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:30 am
These cases are Johnson v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am
He also represented Clarence Earl Gideon in what became a landmark Supreme Court case, decision Gideon v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Noah Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard University where he focuses on constitutional law. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Noah Feldman is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard University where he focuses on constitutional law. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
“Rather, the theories of the administrative state, the public interest, and the judicial process were part of the general atmosphere of thought surrounding the justices. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
This is Felix Wu’s theory of collateral censorship: good content has external benefits and is not distinguishable from bad from outside. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:32 am
Beauharnais v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 11:21 am
Kisor leans heavily, in its analysis, both on Chevron itself and on later opinions about the Chevron test, such as United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” F.C.C. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
