Search for: "State v. Layne"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
State of Indiana (NFP) M.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:23 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Health-Tex, Inc., 567 So. 2d 1307 (Ala. 1990); Layne v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 618, 119 S. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
Professional Drug Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 609, 119 S.Ct. 1692, 143 L.Ed.2d 818 (1999).... [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
Layne, 526 U. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am
It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court's anticipated decision in Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:07 am
Gumwood’s complaint in Gumwood HP Shopping Partners LP v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Layne Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
Abbott, Florida State University College of Law John A. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
FinnCase number: 13-cv-02280 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 16, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 15, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-128 SEC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
The initial comment, posted in January 2010, stated, in part:`This is what I would like to consider a public service profile for anyone that is not aware of Mr. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
(Order) (06/27/2007, non-precedential): petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the district court to issue a decision regarding patent unenforceability; district court entered orders granting summary judgment for invalidity due to indefiniteness; request to certify the invalidity determination for immediate appeal (because there was no final judgment) was denied; petition for writ of mandamus denied because Star Scientific has not shown "a clear abuse of discretion or that the district court… [read post]
