Search for: "State Ex Rel. Cox v. Cox"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
State Col [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
In Hansen, the Court reaffirmed a case from the Rehnquist Court, Illinois ex rel. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
" People ex Rel. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In Obsidian Finance v Cox (23 August 2011), the court ruled in favour of blogger Crystal Cox, who ran the website obsidianfinancesucks.com, where she published a number of serious and damaging statements about a bankruptcy trustee. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 885 So.2d338, 355 (Fla.2004) (quoting Gaskin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Howell raised questions about why some defendants were being permitted to resolve their criminal cases by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor and why the amount of money prosecutors are seeking to recover through those plea deals was based on a relatively paltry estimate of about $1.5 million in damages caused by the rioters. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Mar. 3, 2014); Doe ex rel. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Mar. 3, 2014); Doe ex rel. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (COX, J.) [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
