Search for: "State ex rel. Holmes v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
’” (I have written in academic scholarship that the Hawke Court reached the right result because Ohio’s ratification was already communicated to DC and could not be undone, but not because the word “legislature” should be read to forbid the use of the referendum device.)In two other important cases from the first half of the twentieth century, Ohio ex. rel. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
State ex. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
Eisner, 256 U.S. 345, 349 (1921) (Holmes, J.)).Of the four-factor inquiry:Over the [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm
Related Lexicon Entries Legal Theory Lexicon 001: Ex Ante/Ex Post Legal Theory Lexicon 017: The Rule of Law Legal Theory Lex [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
Holmes offers a rule: The driver must stop and look. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
Holmes offers a rule: The driver must stop and look. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:37 am
Here's my narrow observation for this post: One way of thinking about these controversies has to do with Justice Holmes' argument in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:47 am
Descarga el documento: Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
’” But in rejecting the argument based on Hawke and its reading of Article V, the majority opinion in AIRC instead relied on two other cases, Ohio ex. rel. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:39 am
In 1981, the Supreme Court in United States Postal Service v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
In “The Adventure of Silver Blaze,” Holmes infers from the fact that a dog did not bark that an intruder was not a stranger. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:40 pm
If your goal is ex ante predictability and certainty, then rules are usually the way to go. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
If your goal is ex ante predictability and certainty, then rules are usually the way to go. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Supreme Court … The People of the State of New York, ex rel, William Kemmler against Charles F. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
The trial court held that there is an absolute bar, relying on Clancy (People ex rel. [read post]
